Understanding Usability

« Back to blog

Do you know what people are NOT looking at on your website?

Its not just what people look at that’s important, but what they don’t look at is key too.

To understand this concept, we need understand a bit about how the eye works. A Tobii eye tracking white paper, released in January 2010 shows just how complex the eye really is. What really struck me reading the paper was how much our peripheral vision affects our experience of the World.

Human vision has evolved so we can see in both dark and light conditions. And we can see detail, but also can change what we look at very quickly.  We use different parts of the eye for these purposes. We see detail with the small foveal region of the eye, which is better suited to good light conditions.

The larger part of the eye, the peripheral region, is better suited to poor light conditions. It can detect movement, and contrasts between colours and shapes, but the compromise is that our vision here is blurry.

Media_httpimgskitchco_deyei

When we look at something, the foveal region of the eye pauses on the area of focus. An eye tracker measures these pauses, or fixations, and the movement between the fixations, the saacades. During a saacade, we don’t actually ‘see’ anything. No messages are sent to the brain.

Media_httpimgskitchco_ryyhb

On the image above fixations are represented by the dots, and the path of the saacades by the lines. The bigger the dot, the longer someone has looked at that spot.

When we eye track a website, we can easily see the area of the screen where users didn’t look.  No lines or dots mean there was no fixation it. However, we need to be careful when interpreting this data. Many people would say it is not viewed at all.  But this may not be true!

No data on an area doesn’t mean that the area did not register with the user. With our peripheral vision, we can detect movements and register contrasts between colours and shapes.  The user may have seen the area with their peripheral vision, thought it was an ad, and decided not to go there! This has previously been termed ‘unlooking’ by eye tracking researchers.

In this context, it is important to ask someone why they haven’t looked at a part of the screen.  And we can only know this if we track them!  We use a retrospective think aloud (RTA) method for this reason. The participant’s eye tracking video is replayed to them immediately after they have finished a task and questions asked about their experience and perception of the parts of the page they didn’t look at.

I did have one user who said they thought a coloured block was an ad, so they didn’t look at it, even though it was a government site! Now I am keen to study reasons for ‘unlooking’ at my next eye tracking session.

 

 

Posted by joannalewis 

Comments (3)

Jun 21, 2010
 said...
Interesting. This implies that a mere perception of what a piece of the screen real estate may be can aid or retard its viewing. So does, this mean that fixing specific areas of screen real estate for standard, eg specific spots for advertising, say, or highlighting new features, may actually retard actions. Does it follow that a web page would constantly need to rearrange itself, amoeba like, so that the visitor is not lulled!
Jun 21, 2010
James Breeze said...
Hi Karthik,
That could work. I'd prefer to see the screen real estate changing periodically, as we humans are creatures of habit.
If the screen is the same every time we visit we feel comfortable and trust the site.
Just think how you would feel if you went into the local store to buy your groceries and they changed the layout every day!
Sep 07, 2010
Carl said...
This is why the layout is soo essential!

Leave a comment...